Legal Reasoning Question 21

Post independence, the reform of law continued in two major ways. One was by way of judicial interpretation. The courts started giving liberal interpretation to the provisions of Constitution that were designed to protect life and liberty of citizens. The courts also acted as a vigilant watch guard and ensured that the Legislature does not encroach upon individual freedoms including the freedom of press. On the other hand the Law Commission of India made recommendation; to bring in. changes in the existing laws by way of amendments. Such changes were considered necessary by the Law Commission to weed out from the legal framework of India unnecessary roadblocks in the progress of the country. The contribution of Law Commission can be seen in the reports that it has submitted from time to time. The Law Commission is not a constitutional body, it can merely recommend changes. The government is free to accept or not to accept the changes. In what way did the British period saw a lot of legal change in India?

Options:

A) Customary laws were banned

B) Court system, procedures, equity and justice were introduced

C) Both a and b above

D) Neither a nor b above

Show Answer

Answer:

Correct Answer; B

Solution:

  • (b) The British introduced a lot of changes including establishment of courts, development of procedures, introduction of equity and justice etc. However, the customary laws were not banned. In fact the modern legal system also has place for customary laws such as Hindu Marriage Act and Personal law of Islam.