Legal Reasoning Question 22

Post independence, the reform of law continued in two major ways. One was by way of judicial interpretation. The courts started giving liberal interpretation to the provisions of Constitution that were designed to protect life and liberty of citizens. The courts also acted as a vigilant watch guard and ensured that the Legislature does not encroach upon individual freedoms including the freedom of press. On the other hand the Law Commission of India made recommendation; to bring in. changes in the existing laws by way of amendments. Such changes were considered necessary by the Law Commission to weed out from the legal framework of India unnecessary roadblocks in the progress of the country. The contribution of Law Commission can be seen in the reports that it has submitted from time to time. The Law Commission is not a constitutional body, it can merely recommend changes. The government is free to accept or not to accept the changes. The British administration in India brought about progressive laws. Which among the following is not an example of progressive law made by the British.

Options:

A) Hindu Gains of Learning Act

B) Hindu Marriage Act

C) Hindu Widows Remarriage Act

D) The Indian Slavery Act

Show Answer

Answer:

Correct Answer; B

Solution:

  • (b) All of these acts except (b) were made during the British period. Hindu marriage act is also a progressive act but it was made during the post-independence period.